- NOW TICKETS WITH SELF GUIDED AUDIO GUIDE
The moat of Rhodes wasn’t filled with water—but with danger. Encircling the medieval city, this vast dry trench became one of the most formidable elements of the Knights of Saint John’s defensive strategy.
It was not simply a barrier—it was a calculated military instrument, built to kill, to delay, and to terrify. The moat of Rhodes remains today a rare and stunning example of how stone and earth were shaped into a weapon of war.
Unlike conventional moats filled with water, the moat of Rhodes was intentionally left dry. Stretching nearly 2.5 kilometers around the city’s western and northern flanks, it formed a massive crescent that hugged the base of the city’s outer walls. In many sections, the trench reached over 20 meters in width and dropped sharply to depths of 10 to 15 meters.
These dimensions were no accident; the engineers of the Order calculated them to maximize the field of fire for archers, cannons, and defenders stationed along the battlements. The moat of Rhodes was sculpted partly by adapting to the natural terrain and partly through extensive excavation. Its steep inner walls offered no protection to attackers, who would be fully exposed to crossfire from the city’s bastions above.
In this sense, the moat did not simply delay enemy progress—it created a deadly bottleneck. In coordination with angled bastions, towers, and gun emplacements, it ensured that no approach went undefended.
Choosing to keep the moat dry was a brilliant tactical decision. A water-filled moat, while seemingly more traditional, would have created logistical challenges for maintenance and drainage in Rhodes’ Mediterranean climate. Instead, the dry trench allowed defenders to use it actively during battle. Troops could descend into the moat to intercept breaches or counter mining operations. Moreover, siege towers and floating bridges—common tools in medieval warfare—became useless against the steep, uneven floor of the dry moat.
The Knights had also lined parts of the trench with smaller interior ditches, wooden stakes, and hidden pits, forcing enemy formations to break apart and exposing soldiers to chaotic close-quarters combat. The very ground worked against the invader, turning every step into a risk.
During the Ottoman sieges of 1480 and 1522, the moat of Rhodes was a decisive factor. The attacking forces, numbering in the tens of thousands, found themselves stalled at the edge of this enormous dry trench. Repeated assaults were repelled not only by the strength of the walls but by the killing field in front of them. Ottoman troops attempting to scale the inner escarpment were met with a storm of arrows, fire, and even boiling oil.
In the Siege of 1522, the defenders used false paths and camouflaged trenches within the moat to lead attackers into dead ends. These tactics caused confusion and delay, buying critical time for the Knights to regroup. Despite the overwhelming numbers and artillery fire, the moat absorbed wave after wave of assault, proving itself a vital asset in the city’s prolonged resistance.
Today, the moat of Rhodes is not just a remnant of military history—it is a living monument. Unlike many medieval moats that have been filled or paved over, Rhodes’ moat survives in remarkable condition. Visitors can descend into it and follow its path beneath towering stone walls and bastions. Walking along its course offers a visceral understanding of medieval defense and the terror it once inspired.
Far from a lifeless ruin, the moat now serves a new role—as a venue for cultural events, open-air concerts, and seasonal festivals. Its transformation from battlefield to community space gives it renewed relevance in the urban fabric of modern Rhodes.
The moat of Rhodes stands as one of the most innovative defensive structures of its time. Built to trap, expose, and annihilate, it redefined how military engineers approached city fortification. Though the weapons have fallen silent, the trench continues to speak—of strategy, resilience, and the enduring legacy of those who defended Rhodes stone by stone.
The above article is based on the book ‘Ρόδος’ authored by Theofanis Bogiannos. The article is published with his permission.
